Tag Archives: Chris Chibnall

How Doctor Who S11 could have been saved.

I’ve been a Doctor Who fan (I hate the term Whovian) for over 13 years. The series has had its ups and downs in that time, but I’ve always stuck with it. Even series 10, which tested my patience, had the hooks of an intriguing finale and Capaldi’s exit to convince me to go the distance. But the current series has finally broken my resolve. My interest in the show, at long last, has died. The sad thing is, it really could have been so different. In the words of Peter Davison’s Doctor ‘there should have been another way…’

Having decided to give up, my weekly Who reviews will cease. I may eventually do more Who related content, but this will likely be revisiting either the classic era or episodes from the Davies and Moffat runs. So as a sort of last hurrah, here’s my opinion on how Series 11 could (and should) have been so much better.

Option 1: Fire Chibnall and hire a decent showrunner.

There’s still a possibility that S11 will get its act together with a run of four non-Chibnall episodes. But even if it did, Chibnall’s doing the finale and will still do the lion’s share of the following season – which makes me dead set against continuing. Showrunners have a massive impact on modern TV shows, and while the show can survive hit-and-miss writers (Russell T. Davies) and divisive showrunners (Steven Moffat) it can’t maintain the quality if the head showrunner is a consistently poor writer. A lot of my pre-existing concerns about Chibnall stemmed from his record as showrunner on Torchwood Series 1 and 2. While both series have highs and lows, Chibnall’s episodes were never the highlights, and often included some of the worst in each run (Cyberwoman, Countrycide, etc.). Unsurprisingly, he wasn’t involved in Children of Earth, which was Torchwood’s undisputed highlight, or Miracle Day, its more mixed sequel. This combined with his mixed record on Who should have ruled him out for the position. Especially when the other options were considerably better. I’m not a Being Human fan, but Toby Whitehouse’s experience as a showrunner of a cult fantasy show like that made him a prime candidate for Who (not to mention his record on both Torchwood and Who edges Chibnall’s). Other Who writers who’ve excelled in recent seasons might have also been good shouts (Peter Harness springs to mind – Kill the Moon, the Zygon 2-parter, The Pyramid at the End of the World). Jamie Mathieson would also be up there, as of course would Neil Gaiman. But frankly, its hard to envisage ANYONE having done a worse job than Chibnall. You could have given it to the Merlin/Atlantis guys, who’ve never even written for Who, and I’d probably be happier.

Option 2: Reduce Chibnall’s input and hire more of the proven Who writers. 

If the showrunner is flawed, the show can still succeed, but this is normally only true when the showrunner writes very few episodes. Think of Tennant’s first series. Davies wrote 5 episodes out of 13, but even though 2 of them were utterly dire (New Earth, Love and Monsters) it didn’t hamstring the series, because he nailed the finale and the other writers by and large did a very good job. Chibnall’s decision to retain NO existing Who writers never sat well with me. You need variety on a show like this, and that comes from different writing styles as much as different plots during episodes. Having 5 Chibnall episodes in a row at the start was beyond excessive (especially in a ten episode series), and its telling the only standout was the one co-written by Malorie Blackman. Even Moffat, Who’s best modern writer, never wrote half the episodes of any of his series. He had more sense than that. So, Chibnall should have spread his episodes out a bit more, as well as writing less of them (the opener, the 2nd episode and the finale would have been a good shout). If only he’d hired more proven writers. The number of former who writers who deserve another crack at it is very high: Neil Gaiman (The Doctor’s Wife), Tom Macrae (The Girl Who Waited), Rob Shearman (Dalek), Simon Nye (Amy’s Choice), Matt Jones (The Satan Pit) and Paul Cornell (Human Nature) all come to mind as writers of hit episodes who’d be welcome back. Sure, not all of them may want to, but you’re not seriously telling me NONE of them would?

Option 3: Recast the Doctor. (Hold fire people, hear me out).

It’s really hard to tell whether Jodie’s Whittaker’s take on the character is suffering purely as a result of the writing, or whether she just isn’t suited to the role. Her hit rate is slightly better than Chibnall’s (2 good episodes, 1 average, 2 bad) but her Doctor has some serious issues. Her preachy nature grates really badly, and while her pacifism is a Doctor-ish trait, its being pushed to extremes (think Tennant’s final season, where the character became excessively passive). Her manic energy isn’t as infectious as Smith’s, and her relentless enthusiasm is borderline annoying, and while Jodie’s acting isn’t in question, I do not think the way she’s playing the role suits either her or the character.

Before I get savaged by feminist Whovians, this has literally nothing to do with her being a woman. Her first episode proved that a woman can play the role without any issues (which Michelle Gomez’s run as the Master had already shown most fans anyway). I’d happily welcome another female Doctor, but I’d prefer it to be someone who’s a genuine fan of the show (like Tennant or Capaldi) or someone who can deliver a truly unique take on the character (like Tom Baker or Christopher Eccleston). Jodie’s a fine actress, but I’m not convinced she’s what the show needs.

Just off the top of my head, there are numerous actresses who could own the role (Claire Foy, Maxine Peake, Helena Bonham Carter, Krysten Ritter, Hayley Atwell etc.). If the BBC wanted to go another way for diversity, there’s plenty of non-white actors who’d do a great job (David Harewood, Mahershala Ali, Richard Ayoade, etc.) I’m not one of those people who ever believes acting roles should be cast on the basis of skin colour/gender (unless the character is intrinsically tied to being one way, such as James Bond being always male, Black Panther always being a black actor etc.). But the Doctor isn’t defined by either of those things. So frankly, it doesn’t matter who plays him/her so long as they can do the job. I’m honestly not sure Jodie can.

But from what we’ve seen so far and what’s been said in interviews, I sense Jodie mainly got chosen for two reasons: the BBC/Chibnall wanted a female Doctor; and Chibnall knew and liked her because she worked with him on Broadchurch. Neither of which are good reasons. Moffat’s worked with hundreds of great actors/actresses (Jack Davenport, Benedict Cumberbatch, Michelle Ryan, James Nesbitt) but he chose ones he’d never worked with before. Davies had no pre-existing ties to Tennant, and while he knew Eccleston, Chris was never his first choice. If Jodie was picked because she’s Chibnall’s vision of the character personified, that’s more justifiable but doesn’t help, as his vision is all out of whack.

Option 4: Totally re-work every aspect of Series 11.

Hiring better directors would be a good start (Bring back Rachel Talalay, or hire the standout ones who work for Netflix or Game of Thrones). Using some old monsters rather than dispensable villains-of-the-week (okay, the Daleks, Master and Cybermen have been overused, but there’s plenty of stories left to tell with the Weeping Angels, Sontarans or Ice Warriors, to name just three). Aim the show at a family audience or a young adult one NOT just at children. The show has only really been a pure children’s show once in its history (the early William Hartnell era) and the show wisely ducked out of that approach in the mid/late sixties. Who has always been, and always should be, a program both adults and children can enjoy – and right now it isn’t. Give it a proper story arc or make it entirely episodic (its currently trying to do both and thus is not succeeding at either).

Also, you could change the main cast. The show has only had two spells of three companions in the Tardis (1963-1965, 1980-1982) and to be honest, both those eras have a couple of very weak companions, even if some of them are stronger (Ian and Barbara, Turlough). This is natural, because let’s face it, developing four main characters in a satisfying way and giving them all enough to do on a show like Who isn’t easy. There’s a reason Moffat didn’t have River travel with Amy and Rory full time. If there has to be three companions, why not do something really different and kill Ryan in the opening episode, and have Grace travel with Graham and the Doctor instead? She was a much more interesting character in the premiere, and we’ve never had an older couple in the Tardis (or even an older woman), and you’d still have the whole grief plotline playing out over the series, and the superlative Bradley Walsh. Ryan is nothing we haven’t seen before (male sidekick character who gets involved in the action or serves as comic relief). Aside from his dyspraxia, he really has very little to differentiate himself from Mickey or Rory (particularly if they go the predictable route and pair him up with Yaz). No slight on Tosin Cole’s acting, but aside from the Rosa episode, the character hasn’t shown a lot of potential. Rather than making stupid political points in a ham-fisted way every two episodes, how about the show does something truly groundbreaking, like putting the Doctor and Yaz in a relationship (not only does that have TONNES of storytelling potential, but it would also give Yaz something to do, not to mention allow the show to explore the Doctor’s sexuality, which is a topic it rarely dares touch). Additionally, rather than glossing over the Doctor’s gender change with a couple of jokes, how about explore the impact this has on the character. I’m not saying the Doctor should visibly change personality or dislike the idea, but given the character has never changed gender before, you’d think we’d at least see some sort of phase where she gets used to it.

Well there you have it. I’ll bring this to a close before it goes any further into a full-on rant, but there you have it. It’s only my opinion, and the show may yet prove me wrong. But either way, I’m not tuning in to find out.

Since I’m no longer covering Who, expect a few more video game reviews and Netflix Shows on my blog in the future. I may have started the blog to write about Doctor Who, but honestly, it’s not worth it anymore, even if its behind some of my most-read articles.

Thank you to everyone who’s read, liked, or commented on my Doctor Who reviews and articles, but after 4 years of blogging and 13 years of watching, I’m hanging up my sonic.

‘Doctor… I let you go’ (If only it had ended with Peter).


Doctor Who: The Tsuranga Conundrum Review

By Chris ‘can’t write for toffee’ Chibnall

Minor spoilers follow

The fact I’m insulting the writer in the first line probably tells you what I thought of this one. It many ways it wasn’t as irritating as ‘The Ghost Monument’ or ‘Arachnids in the UK’ but it had another, major, problem. It bored me.

First the (few) positives. The P’Ting was actually quite an interesting idea, even if it looked like a gremlin crossed with the crazy frog. The idea of an alien that isn’t inherently evil but causes misery via its own efforts to survive has been done before on Who (those Stingrays in Planet of the Dead for example) but never quite like this. Chibnall’s irritating and ham-fisted politics rarely reared their head here. Also the direction was competent and the special effects have never been better. Unfortunately, I just ran out of positives.

Even the things I’ve liked about previous episodes didn’t shine here. The music faded into the background and wasn’t remotely memorable. Bradley Walsh did a good job but had nothing to work with this time. Ryan and Yaz got a share of the action but had nothing interesting to really do (again!). Jodie’s Doctor was less preachy but her enthusiasm remains annoying rather than infectious (if they’re going for a female Matt Smith vibe, they’re failing badly!). It seems clear that Chibnall always places more emphasis on the guest characters than the main cast, which was okay in previous weeks because the guest actors were usually interesting, well written or performed well.

This week, they were well acted but poorly written and totally bland. I couldn’t give a damn if any of them survived, which is never a good sign. Whatever you thought of Russell T. Davies, at least his supporting characters dying had an impact on the episode (As shown by the flashbacks in Journey’s End). Whatever you thought of Clara, Bill, Amy or Rory, at least Moffat ALWAYS gave them something of note to do. Chibnall is failing on both counts right now. He’s wasting his energy writing sub-plots no one really cares about (such as the Cicero siblings animosity or the male pregnant alien – who the hell bloody cares!!). The only thing he throws in that has an impact is Ryan and Graham’s shared grief, but that’s 2 mins out of 50 and can’t carry things by itself. Ryan’s absent father plot might work depending on how it pays off, but his revelation to Yaz about his mother seemed really random and not naturally brought up – the writing felt forced, as if Chibnall thought this needed to be introduced now, when really it should have been drip-fed throughout the series.

The big problem in the episode was the threat level was high, but you knew it would be okay in the end (one character might die, but you know a ship full of main cast can’t be destroyed. Again, the supporting characters being bland doesn’t help either, cause they’re the only ones ever really at threat here. The most interesting of them is dead in the first 15 mins, too.

Overall, the episode looks good and has a memorable alien for the first time this year, but the writing lets it down again, with bland characters, a half-baked plot and an ill-used cast. I’m hoping the other writers might pick things up now Chibnall’s run of stories is done. But I won’t hold my breath.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5

Next Time: A Yaz centric episode? Let’s hope it finally gives Mandip Gill something to work with.

Doctor Who: Arachnids in the UK Review

By Chris Chibnall

Minor Spoilers Follow.

So after an intriguing opener, a frustratingly bland follow-up, and a politically-charged, powerful but divisive third entry, has Doctor Who’s 11th Series finally found some rhythm?

No. No it bloody hasn’t. And it’s abundantly obvious who’s fault that is.

The cast do their best here, but while they keep things watchable, its very hard for actors to rescue things where the writing is this poor and the dialogue this ham-fisted. Bradley Walsh continues to impress, and it was a relief to see Mandip Gill get slightly more screentime this week (now her family’s been introduced hopefully that might help flesh her out a bit). You suspect in the Moffat/Davies years Yaz would have been the sole companion – and I feel sorry for the actress cause I think she would have knocked it out of the park back then. Now, the material isn’t good enough and she’s got little enough of it compared to the other four. Tosin Cole doesn’t get that much to do this week, but he seems to have settled into the role of Ryan well enough. I am not liking Jodie as much as I thought I would a few weeks back – but with this kind of writing its very hard to tell how much that’s on her. She’s clearly as good an actor as the previous Doctors but her Doctor’s personality is getting a bit wearing. Doctors are always on Thin Ice with me when they get too preachy (Tennant and Capaldi both came close to this during their last seasons) and unfortunately Jodie’s incarnation gets VERY preachy whenever she goes into moral outrage mode. Yes, the Doctor should always be someone who calls out injustice, stands up to evil and holds the universe to rights. But this NEEDS to be shown – NOT spelt out for the audience as if we’re all four-year-olds.

Anyway, the writing. God the dialogue is atrocious in places. Gone are the dramatic, uplifting speeches of Moffat or the intense drama that Davies dished out. While some of the quiet, understated moments of emotion or humour work, this is largely down to Bradley Walsh or Tosin Cole, not the script. I can’t think of a single memorable line that Jodie has said so far to be honest. The plot is still riddled with clichés (monsters and toxic waste – really? Even comic books dropped that one a long time back) and while, yes it is very easy to take shots at Americans at the moment, the politics here felt REALLY forced. Chris Noth’s businessman was such an obvious caricature than it was hard to take him seriously as a character, and let’s face it, he was just incompetent and closed-minded, not devious or despicable enough to be a compelling villain. The Doctor having a thing against guns is nothing new (4 and 10 were especially notable for this) but most of them do, reluctantly, permit their use by allies when needed. Some of them have indeed used them in particularly dire scenarios (5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12 have all used some form of weapon when needed). But again, the issue here got very preachy – and the sympathy for the spiders was, while a doctor-ish trait, done in an on-the-nose and ham fisted way.

Now I’m no fan of spiders – I have a notable fear of the larger, hairier varieties. But these ones were not scary. Harry Potter had scarier ones with 2002 level special effects. While they certainly looked realistic, they weren’t creepy enough and never really threatened the main cast in a significant way. The direction was a mixed-bag – the show still looks miles better than it did even a couple of series ago, but the director really didn’t seem able to make anything remotely scary. For one thing, everywhere is too well lit – it doesn’t matter how proud you are of your CGI monsters, you know they’ll probably look better in the dark – and they’ll definitely be scarier. The composer gave it a decent shot (and let’s face it, creepy music wasn’t always Murray Gold’s forte either) but it was probably his least memorable contribution so far.

The guest cast seemed good (the one thing every episode has nailed so far has been the guest actors/actresses) but Chris Noth in particular seemed to deserve much better material (like Art Malik in Episode 2). Yaz’s family seem like interesting characters, which is a relief after Clara’s and Bill’s dragged things down whenever they showed up, so hopefully we’ll see a bit more of them as the series goes on.

In many ways ‘Arachnids in the UK’ reminded me of Oxygen last year. Poor writing, crap political asides and lame jokes coupled with uninspired direction and a cast that, despite their best efforts, can’t rescue it. Since Oxygen is arguably my least favourite Capaldi episode, this is not a good sign. Series 11 so far has had one of  the weakest starts of any modern series. Normally in Who when this happens, things pick up around episode 5 or 6. Fingers crossed.

Overall, while the episode was watchable and the cast shone in a couple of places, Chibnall is falling below my already low expectations for him. Even his ‘Cyberwoman’ and ‘Sex Alien’ episodes of torchwood had more oomph than this. The cast has potential, but you just get the constant sense that things could be so much better with a different writer and showrunner. Whatever Moffat and Davies’ flaws, they never had me this worried about the shows future.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5

Next Time: F*** knows. Something in a hospital. These teasers are just annoyingly bland now – they’re better off scrapping them completely.

On the plus side – only 1 more Chibnall episode left before we get 4 in a row where he isn’t involved. Whether I still care by that point is debatable.

Doctor Who: The Ghost Monument Review

The Ghost Monument by Chris Chibnall

The first episode of Series 11 showed a lot of promise (particularly from the cast and the new composer), but a few lingering questions remain. Most importantly, can Chibnall live up to the relatively high standards set by both Moffat and Russell T. Davies? Davies may have written some absolute stinkers of episodes (The Long Game, Gridlock, Love and Monsters, the End of Time Part 1 etc.) and Moffat may have given us some deeply unsatisfying series arcs (The Hybrid, The Vault) but both oversaw very successful eras of the show and wrote some cracking episodes (The Parting of the Ways, The Girl in the Fireplace, Blink, The Waters of Mars etc.). To date, Chibnall’s best effort for Who (or Torchwood for that matter) is Dinosaurs on a Spaceship, which I’d give a 4/5 to for its excellent comedy value and character work. But he’s never written a real classic for either series he’s worked on, which, now he’s showrunner, really needs to change.

After the Ghost Monument, I can safely say: it hasn’t yet.

Chibnall’s strength definitely seems to lie with character work. His previous instalments of Who and his efforts on Torchwood tend to support that statement, and it was no doubt a factor to making Broadchurch such a success. Unfortunately, his storytelling prowess isn’t anywhere near as refined. As with last week, the Sonic was overused to get out of trouble, the cliff-hanger was resolved with minimal fuss or logic, and the story’s villain were little more than window dressing. The plot, like last week, also isn’t all that inventive for sci-fi shows, and again didn’t justify the full runtime. While I’m broadly supportive of Chibnall’s decision to rely solely on new villains for this series, they need to be good ones for that to work. Focus solely on the heroes and neglect the monsters and villains they face off with and you end up with Thor: The Dark World or the Flash Season 3 and 4: superficially fun but ultimately inconsequential and forgettable. Last week I gave Chibnall a pass because he wrote Whittaker and the new companions rather well. This week even that was a bit shaky – having Jodie talk her way through half an episode doesn’t work when what she’s saying has no oomph or real interest. The dialogue was generally pretty forgettable – Moffat and Davies may have relied too much on flamboyance and punchlines, but as least they gave Eccleston, Tennant, Smith and Capaldi something that would actually hold your attention.

Moving past Chibnall, the support cast are still generally working quite well. Bradley Walsh was probably the standout companion this week, though Tosin Cole still had a decent share of the action as Ryan. Yaz seems worryingly underutilized so far, generally existing to ask questions so the Doctor can go into long, never-ending answers. This is no slight on Mandip Gill, its just that so far, she hasn’t really been given anything decent to work with, which needs to change soon. Ensembles only work if all the cast add something and their characters get developed somewhat evenly. Jodie Whittaker didn’t impress as much this time round. She’s clearly a good actress, but talking ENDLESSLY and waving the sonic about is not what makes a good Doctor, and the writers really need to give her something more substantial to do (there was no real standout heroism this time, and the character’s pointless manic energy started to grate a bit).

The guest cast, at least, are good value here. Susan Lynch and Shaun Dooley made for an enterprising pair of rivals/rogues, and Chibnall does give them both distinct personalities to work with. Art Malik also makes the most of his limited role as the rather sinister Ilin, who a better episode might have made far more use of. He gives up way too easily at the end, which was a sure fire sign the plot had run out of steam. The direction isn’t as good as the premiere but is still decent, and we’ve seen far worse effects on this show. Still, Mark Tonderai is no Rachel Talalay, and I hope he adds a bit more spark to proceedings next time. The new composer is still performing though, his more understated style a real contrast to Murray Gold (who did sometimes have a tendency to get a bit too loud and bombastic, even if he nailed it the other 80% of the time).

Overall ‘The Ghost Monument’ was a definite step back from the premiere. Whittaker’s Doctor suffered noticeably with weaker material, and despite Bradley Walsh’s best efforts, the companions didn’t shine as much either. The guest cast were good, but had so much emphasis on them they overshadowed the regulars. Another weak villain leaves me worried that Series 10’s flaws may not be entirely gone yet.

Rating: 2.5 out of 5. On the plus side, that’s what I gave Matt Smith’s 2nd episode, so the show does have a record of improving from here on out in a Doctor’s run. It better bloody get a move on though.

Next Time: The Doctor and friends run into Rosa Parks (aka Sergeant Donovan off Sherlock). The trailer was so ludicrously short that’s all I have to say. I mean, I don’t mind a lack of spoilers, but why even bother with trailers if they tell you basically nothing nor give you a reason to tune in next time?

Final Thought: While I’m ambivalent about the new Sonic Screwdriver, I’m really not a fan of the new Tardis design. I can see what they were going for, but it seems far too gimmicky for me.


The Woman Who Fell to Earth Review

By Chris Chibnall

Warning: Spoilers!

Well there were a lot of questions hanging over this opener. New Doctor, New Companions, New Showrunner, New Director and New Composer. 4 of them shone. One did not.

First off, the good news. Jodie Whittaker is great! She feels natural in the role from the first minute she’s on screen. She’s got a milder version of Smith’s maniac energy, but at the same time, her interpretation feels fresh and different from those that came before. Which isn’t easy after 12 (more if you count John Hurt and David Bradley) previous actors have given it their all. The script doesn’t ask too much of her, but what is here is very, very promising.

The companions aren’t bad either. Tosin Cole gets the lion’s share of the material as Ryan, but Mandip Gill and Bradley Walsh come off just as well. Most importantly, they’re all likeable, and all somewhat relatable. Companions tend to work well if you feel like they are someone you could actually meet, and that’s true for all three of them here. I look forward to seeing how they develop over the season.

The direction is pretty good too, which is a relief after some of the weak efforts last season. The special effects look as good as they ever have, and this is an earth-bound episode! The monster’s design isn’t all that memorable, but it was hardly a disaster.

The music feels suitably different from Murray Gold’s style, but still fitting for the show. We’ll see how it goes going forward, but so far, Segun Akinola is doing a good job.

Now the bad news. I never had a problem with Jodie’s casting, but I’ve always been slightly nervous about Chibnall. His record on Who is alright but not inspiring, and his record on Torchwood is pretty damn shaky in places. Sure he wrote Broadchurch, but only the first season of that got critical acclaim, so my scepticism remained. I hoped he’d prove me wrong.

So far he hasn’t. He handles the character introductions well, and his character work in general is very good. But the plot isn’t particularly fresh, and some of the old who clichés are annoyingly present here (the Doctor survives a fall with no explanation how, the episode is resolved by some sonic wizardry which isn’t even hinted at). It’s pretty predictable stuff as well – you see every death coming a mile away.

Still, its only episode one. Russell T Davies took a while to hit his stride, and Moffat’s season openers were rarely perfect, so I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt for now.

Overall, there was plenty of promise, some upgraded special effects, good direction and  lacklustre writing. But the cast looks good, so I’ll be happy to stick with it for a while. Most importantly of all, Who is still Who, and any debate about Whittaker’s casting is over. She fits the role perfectly and I hope she gets the material to really show it soon.

Rating: 3.5 out of 5

Last Thought: That new version of the theme tune intrigues me. Its very classic, but with a modern twist. I think I like it!